LinkNotes: Cognitive Fun Improve Your Fluid Intelligence
6 Star it
Share
Rob Jongschaap , Enschede:
May 18 2008
Made Popular May 20 2008
Some examples of a computer based brain-training method designed to improve working memory, which as has been reported recently by a Swiss-American team, also increases scores in “fluid intelligence”, or general problem-solving ability.
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Hi Pooja, thanks for your comment.
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
Local Opinions (2)
1 Stars
Is this true, I mean, crystallizing intelligence?
But I read it (in school) that ones intelligence depends upon the size of the cortex respectively the number of its convolutions.
Or am I taking the whole thing wrong, please help :(
But I read it (in school) that ones intelligence depends upon the size of the cortex respectively the number of its convolutions.
Or am I taking the whole thing wrong, please help :(
1 Stars
Hi Pooja, thanks for your comment.
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
Global Opinions (2)
1 Stars
Is this true, I mean, crystallizing intelligence?
But I read it (in school) that ones intelligence depends upon the size of the cortex respectively the number of its convolutions.
Or am I taking the whole thing wrong, please help :(
But I read it (in school) that ones intelligence depends upon the size of the cortex respectively the number of its convolutions.
Or am I taking the whole thing wrong, please help :(
1 Stars
Hi Pooja, thanks for your comment.
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
An answer to your question can be found in one of the references cited in the article [ Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory — Jaeggi et al., 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ]
” ... there is a long history of research into cognitive training showing that, although performance on trained tasks can increase dramatically, transfer of this learning to other tasks remains poor. Here, we present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is entirely different from the intelligence test itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of gain in intelligence critically depends on the amount of training: the more training, the more improvement in Gf. That is, the training effect is dosage-dependent. Thus, in contrast to many previous studies, we conclude that it is possible to improve Gf without practicing the testing tasks themselves, opening a wide range of applications.”
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 





But I read it (in school) that ones intelligence depends upon the size of the cortex respectively the number of its convolutions.
Or am I taking the whole thing wrong, please help :(